Skip to content

Remove ORC from Iceberg module - #36100

Closed
ahmedabu98 wants to merge 1 commit into
apache:masterfrom
ahmedabu98:remove_orc_iceberg
Closed

Remove ORC from Iceberg module#36100
ahmedabu98 wants to merge 1 commit into
apache:masterfrom
ahmedabu98:remove_orc_iceberg

Conversation

@ahmedabu98

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

It's not a widely used format, and it's pulling in CVEs that require an ORC version beyond what Iceberg's latest version uses.

@ahmedabu98

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

R: @kennknowles

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @ahmedabu98, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request streamlines the Apache Iceberg module by completely removing support for the ORC file format. This change is driven by the format's low adoption within the module and the presence of security vulnerabilities (CVEs) in its associated dependencies. By eliminating ORC, the project reduces its attack surface, simplifies dependency management, and maintains a more focused and secure codebase.

Highlights

  • Deprecation of ORC Format Support: The ORC (Optimized Row Columnar) file format support has been completely removed from the Iceberg module.
  • Security and Maintenance Improvement: This removal addresses security vulnerabilities (CVEs) associated with ORC dependencies and streamlines the codebase by eliminating support for a rarely used format.
  • Build and Codebase Simplification: ORC-related dependencies, imports, and code paths have been entirely removed from the Iceberg module's build configuration and source files.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Sep 9, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Stopping reviewer notifications for this pull request: review requested by someone other than the bot, ceding control. If you'd like to restart, comment assign set of reviewers

@kennknowles

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

If it turns out someone wants it, we can switch to a serviceloader architecture or something like that so it can be a separate dependency.

@ahmedabu98 ahmedabu98 closed this Oct 1, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants